Do 'originals' of translations exist anymore?

In the traditional sense, "originals" of translations referred to the source text before it was translated into another language. These originals still exist, as they serve as the basis for the translation process.

However, the term "original" can also be used in the context of translated documents to refer to the translated text itself, especially when discussing the authenticity or accuracy of the translation. In this sense, the "original" translation refers to the first version of the translation produced by the translator.

With advancements in technology and translation practices, the concept of "originals" in translation has evolved. In digital environments, the source text and translated text are often stored electronically, making it easy to track changes and revisions. Additionally, translations may undergo multiple revisions, with each version considered an "original" in its own right.

So, while the notion of 'originals' still exist according to some, they do not exist according to others. For example, before the technological era arrived, translations were done by hand and on paper. Unfortunately, this practice is rarely carried out these days, thanks to the marvels of computers, and thus, an original of a translation does not exist. However, many governmental departments still tell their customers that they need the 'original', and then the customer contacts a translator saying that they were told that they needed the 'original'. As a translator, when we are asked to provide the 'original', all we do is print it out on our printer, and post it off, which then costs the client at least $11 extra. This could all be avoided if a) government departments stopped telling people that they need the 'original' and/or b) customers simply print out the translation from their end.

In the end, it seems that whilst translators have moved into the digital age, some government departments have not, but nevertheless need to.